Virginia’s health planning process utilizes a Certificate of Public Need (COPN) program, also referred to as a Certificate of Need, as a regulatory mechanism to control the development of particular health services and facilities.
Under Virginia Code §§ 32.1-102.1 and 32.1-102.1:3, a COPN is required to:
Under Virginia Code § 32.1-102.10, facility owners or sponsors that commence a COPN-required project without approval are subject to penalties and will be denied a license for the project.
As it is not unusual for there to be a close call on whether a project requires a COPN, it is important to consult advisors with specific experience in Virginia’s COPN process. Additionally, it is helpful to meet directly with the Virginia Department of Health’s Division of Certificate of Public Need (DCOPN) to discuss a potential application. In some cases where the COPN criteria for determining need would indicate that an application would be unsuccessful, the potential needs of the applicant and the location involved may otherwise justify the application.
The Planning Stage
In practical terms, planning should begin six to 12 months prior to the application submittal as a significant amount of information needs to be gathered. Key information includes:
Assuming that a COPN is required, application timing must also be considered. COPN applications are considered in a structured batching process, and the application type determines when the review cycle commences. There are two review cycles per year, each of which commences every six months. Parties have two opportunities per year to apply; if a window is missed, the project faces a delay of at least six months.
The Review Process
The review process begins with a letter of intent, which is followed with the application itself. The application is reviewed by DCOPN staff during a “Completeness Review.” Assuming that the application is complete, a public comment period then begins.
A public hearing will be held in place of a public comment period if there are competing COPN requests of if the applicant requests a hearing. If the region in which the project is located has a local health planning agency, the public hearing will be conducted by the local health planning agency, which also conducts a review of the application and issues recommendations to the Division of Certificate of Public Need. If there is no local health planning agency—which is the case in most of Virginia—the public hearing is conducted by DCOPN.
Following the public comment period or public hearing, DCOPN will review any recommendation from the local health planning agency and issue its recommendation to the Commissioner of Health. If the recommendation is to deny the COPN, then an informal fact finding conference (IFFC) will be conducted. In the absence of a negative recommendation from DCOPN, an IFFC will only be conducted if it is requested by the applicant or if a party who opposes the application can demonstrate standing to request the IFFC. Assuming that there is no IFFC, the entire process from letter of intent to the decision of the Commissioner of Health should take approximately six months. The Commissioner’s decision may be appealed to Circuit Court by the applicant or another party deemed to have an interest in the application.
Virginia Code § 32.1-102.3 sets forth the criteria the Commissioner of Health is required to use to determine if a COPN should be granted. There are eight different criteria, not all of which apply to each application.
One important aspect of the review criteria is the “extent to which the application is consistent with the State Health Services Plan (SHSP),” which is located at 12VAC5-230. These regulations outline detailed criteria for various types of services that fall under the COPN review process. Although the SHSP is quite detailed, it does not always have specific criteria for every type of application. Ambulatory surgery centers, for example, are licensed in Virginia as an outpatient hospital and do not have specific criteria in the SHSP, although there is criteria for surgery services in general.
Simply relying on the SHSP, however, or the criteria for determining a need set forth in the Virginia Code, may lead to an incorrect assumption that an application will be denied. There are many factors that come into play in the review process. Each applicant and application should be viewed independently, even if the proposed service or facility modification is similar to another application.
Missing a deadline or failing to include important information in the application process can unnecessarily torpedo an application that might otherwise have been approved if the parties were familiar with the process. Advisors and legal counsel familiar with Virginia’s COPN program can provide experienced insights and suggest ways to position an application for success.
Attorneys and practice areas related to this topic include:
Click here for a printable file.
This has been provided as an informational service and does not constitute legal counsel or advice, which can only be rendered in the context of specific factual situations. If a legal issue should arise, please contact an attorney listed or retain the assistance of other competent legal counsel. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case and results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken.